Who Actually Writes Islamic History?
Who Actually Writes Islamic History?
Introduction: History is Never Neutral
Who has the right to write Islamic history? This question is rarely asked openly, but it’s crucial. Behind every historical narrative lies interest, bias, and a deliberate selection of what deserves to be remembered and what should be buried. As a writer trying to stay neutral, I put myself in the position of an ordinary reader: we often think Islamic history is singular, yet its authors are diverse and often contradictory. (Source: Edward Said, Orientalism, 1978).
Islamic History: From Scholars to Orientalists
At first, Islamic history was written by Muslim historians themselves. Ibn Ishaq, Al-Tabari, Al-Masudi, Ibn Khaldun they recorded events through oral tradition, documents, and observation. They didn’t just record facts but interpreted them, added religious context, and sometimes inserted personal views. (Source: Franz Rosenthal, A History of Muslim Historiography, 1952).
However, since the 18th century, a wave of Orientalism emerged in Europe. Western scholars studied the Islamic world from their own perspective. Many Orientalist works are academically valuable but often planted colonial bias: portraying Islam as the “other” and backward. (Source: Bernard Lewis, Islam and the West, 1993).
Narrative of Conquest: Who Benefits?
One clear example of bias is the writing of conquest narratives. Muslim conquests of Persia, Byzantium, Spain, and India are often portrayed as brutal, while phases of assimilation, tolerance, and scientific development are sidelined. (Source: Marshall Hodgson, The Venture of Islam, 1974).
Conversely, some classical Muslim writers tended to glorify: recording victory after victory while covering up dark facts like internal power struggles or civil wars. Therefore, I believe reading Islamic history requires double critical lenses toward both Western and internal narratives.
Modern Propaganda: Media and History
In the modern era, Islamic history is not just in historians’ hands but also mass media, film, and even influencers. Movies like Kingdom of Heaven depict the Crusades from a Western perspective, though fairly balanced. Still, many Islamic historical details are romanticized or oversimplified. (Source: Jonathan Riley-Smith, The Crusades: A History, 2005).
As a writer, I believe today’s generation is more easily swayed by viral narratives than in-depth research. Here’s the danger: public opinion can be shaped by “instant” history writers who lack credible sources.
Contemporary Muslim Historians: Between Academics and Activists
Notably, there’s a recent wave of contemporary Muslim historians trying to rewrite Islamic history with a modern approach. Scholars like Wael Hallaq, Tariq Ramadan, and Hamid Dabashi work to deconstruct Orientalist bias while reminding Muslims not to fall into excessive glorification. (Source: Wael B. Hallaq, The Impossible State, 2013).
I find their approach refreshing. They’re not mere archivists but also interpreters of meaning behind events. They urge Muslims to reflect: history is not just about victories but lessons.
Who Writes History in Our Schools?
This question matters: who writes Islamic history textbooks for Muslim schools? Many curricula in Muslim countries are shaped by official state narratives. Rebellions are written as suppressions, certain figures are aggrandized, political opponents erased from textbooks. (Source: Peter Gran, Islamic Roots of Capitalism, 1979).
Here, I see we have homework: to open space for independent historians, local researchers, and archives not locked by governments.
Finding Alternative Histories: Archives and Digital Age
Today, young Muslim diasporas revive alternative histories through blogs, podcasts, and independent research. They don’t just repeat old narratives but also dig up hidden primary sources. (Source: Leila Ahmed, Women and Gender in Islam, 1992).
In my view, this is the hope. The digital world has broken the monopoly over history. But the challenge remains: in the internet age, historical hoaxes spread too. We must be more critical in distinguishing academic data from mere political spins.
Reflection: Who Writes It? All of Us
So, who truly writes Islamic history? For me, the answer is: all of us. Every writer, reader, teacher, journalist, and content creator is a history writer. What we choose to tell, what we deliberately silence shapes how the next generation understands Islam.
History is never final. It is rewritten every era. Our job is not to swallow it whole but to check, study, and honestly rewrite it. (Source: Khaled Abou El Fadl, Speaking in God’s Name, 2001).
Conclusion: Read, Write, Revise
As a neutral writer, I believe the future of Islamic history lies in the hands of critical readers. We must combine modern methods, authentic sources, and the courage to challenge the status quo. If Muslims are content only as consumers of history, then others will continue to write our narrative.
Being an Islamic history writer doesn’t require a PhD. It only takes courage, honesty, and a commitment to seek sources. In this digital era, every click and upload is a new piece of history. Who writes it? All of us.
Komentar
Posting Komentar