How Does the Western World Read the Rise of Political Islam?
How Does the Western World Read the Rise of Political Islam?
Introduction
If you ask me what global issue most often sparks controversy between East and West, my answer would be the rise of political Islam. Over the past few decades, this topic has repeatedly surfaced in international forums, Western media headlines, and academic debates. The question is: how does the Western world actually interpret the rise of political Islam? Is it seen purely as a threat, or also as an opportunity for dialogue?
(Esposito, Islam and Politics, 1998)
Why Is This Issue So Sensitive?
Personally, I believe the rise of political Islam did not emerge overnight. It is rooted in a long historical context — from the fall of the Ottoman Caliphate and European colonialism to modern Western interventions in the Middle East. All of this has shaped the collective memory among Muslims that “political Islam” is a means of reclaiming sovereignty.
(Kepel, Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam, 2002)
In the West, however, the phrase “political Islam” is often associated with extremism or radicalism. I think this is understandable, given events like the Iranian Revolution, the Taliban’s return, or the rise of ISIS, which have led many Western observers to view political Islam through a lens of suspicion. Yet the spectrum of political Islam is incredibly broad ranging from moderate parliamentary movements to fundamentalist ideologies.
Perception in Western Media
When I read Western news coverage, I often see the framing as black and white. Islamic political movements in many Muslim countries are frequently reduced to two poles: “moderate Islamists” who can be partnered with, and “radical Islamists” who must be eliminated.
(Bayat, Post-Islamism: The Changing Faces of Political Islam, 2013)
For example, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt was once hailed as the hope of Arab Spring democracy. But after they came to power, much of the Western media shifted tone, portraying them as a threat to stability. This shows just how complicated it is for the West to grasp political Islam: torn between democratic ideals and fears of Sharia.
Fear of an Islamic State
I think one of the West’s biggest fears is the possibility of a strong transnational Islamic state. Many Western analysts still carry the trauma of the Ottoman Caliphate as a global power. The discourse on the “return of the Caliphate” is often read as a challenge to the modern geopolitical order.
(Roy, The Failure of Political Islam, 1994)
In this sense, I believe Western anxiety is understandable. Yet sometimes these fears are excessive, especially when all aspirations for political Islam are lumped together. Many Islamic political movements actually focus on local reform, education, or social welfare. But the narrative “political Islam = terrorism” sells better in the media.
Geopolitical Interests at Play
In my analysis, the Western perception cannot be separated from geopolitical interests. The rise of political Islam in the Middle East is often seen as a threat to Western allies like Saudi Arabia or Israel. When Islamic parties win elections in Palestine (Hamas) or Tunisia (Ennahda), the West’s reaction is often ambiguous: supporting democracy yet fearing democracy might bring “anti-Western” regimes.
(Volpi, Political Islam: A Critical Reader, 2011)
I think this is the core dilemma: the West supports democracy but is not prepared if democracy produces Islamic political power. This results in double standards: if secularists win, democracy is celebrated; if Islamists win, democracy’s legitimacy is questioned.
Political Islam in the Digital Era
I also observe that the rise of political Islam today cannot be separated from digital technology. Social media, YouTube channels, online forums all serve as new platforms for political Islam activists to build narratives. Naturally, this makes the West more vigilant because propaganda is harder to control.
(Mandaville, Global Political Islam, 2007)
Yet on the flip side, the digital era also opens doors for dialogue. Many Muslim intellectuals use the internet to explain that political Islam is not synonymous with violence. The younger generation now has access to fresher discourse beyond extremist propaganda.
Behind the Rhetoric: Threat or Opportunity?
For me, the big question is: is the rise of political Islam purely a threat to the West? Or could it be an opportunity to build a more balanced relationship?
I see that, if the West is honest, many Islamic parties actually push for procedural democracy. They emerge as an antidote to secular dictatorships that the West once supported.
(Hamid, Islamic Exceptionalism, 2016)
This means political Islam is not always anti-democratic. What must be watched are groups that exploit Islam for violent ambitions. Here, moderate Muslims play a crucial role in shaping a just, open, and non-exclusive political Islam.
Internal Challenges in the Muslim World
Of course, I don’t want to blindly praise political Islam either. In many countries, Islamic political movements have failed to prove they are better than corrupt secular regimes. Internal conflicts, power struggles among elites, and failures in governance often leave people disappointed.
That’s why I think the Muslim world must also self-reflect. If it wants recognition as a legitimate political partner for the West, political Islam must demonstrate accountability, transparency, and social justice not just slogans of Sharia.
(Ayoob, The Many Faces of Political Islam, 2007)
Closing: Rethinking the Narrative
In closing, I personally hope the West does not get trapped in the stigma “political Islam = terrorism.” Conversely, I hope the Muslim world does not see the West as an eternal enemy. The middle ground is building political literacy, interfaith dialogue, and distinguishing between democratic Islamic movements and extremists.
If the younger generation learns from history, the rise of political Islam does not always have to be interpreted as a global threat. It can be a moment of correction: that Islam has space in modern political contestation as long as it is practiced with principles of peace, openness, and respect for international law.
Because in the end, politics is just a tool. It is always people who decide how to wield it.
Komentar
Posting Komentar