Why Is Islamic History Often Cut and Twisted?

Why Is Islamic History Often Cut and Twisted? Introduction: A Collective Wound on the Stage of Narrative As a neutral writer, I often ask myself: why is Islamic history a civilization spanning more than 14 centuries with its legacy of science, philosophy, art, and diplomacy so often reduced to mere chapters of conflict? If we trace it, this “cutting” pattern isn’t new. It has grown from classic orientalism to modern media narratives (Said, Orientalism , 1978). Islamic history is often presented in fragments: the Crusades are glorified, Andalusia is briefly mentioned, the Ottoman conquests are framed as aggression, and today, “jihad” is equated solely with terrorism. What’s the motive behind this? I think this is the question worth unpacking slowly. (Hodgson, The Venture of Islam , 1974). Early Stage: History as a Tool of Power Since colonial times, the West has used historical writing as a weapon of narrative. 18th and 19th-century European historians like Edward Gi...